Off Center
 
A comprehensive transaction-based customer satisfaction (C-Sat) measurement process is essential for any organization hoping to keep its finger on the pulse of customer sentiment and its hand in the pocket containing the customer’s wallet. By “transaction-based” I mean the process involves a post-contact survey designed to captures customers’ ratings and feedback immediately following an interaction with the call center. And by “comprehensive” I mean that at least one of the call center’s managers has been hospitalized while trying to get the C-Sat survey design and measurement process just right.

Many organizations claim to effectively measure C-Sat, but merely go through the motions. For instance, rather than use a post-contact survey, it’s not uncommon for call centers to rely on internal quality monitoring to gauge customer sentiment and satisfaction. That’s sort of the equivalent of having a chef or waiter decide whether or not diners have enjoyed their meal.

Other centers may use a post-contact survey – even a well-designed one – but have made the C-Sat measurement process all about numbers/percentages rather than about analysis and action. Managers in these centers are completely content with their enviable 85%-90% C-Sat rate but haven’t a clue as to how such numbers relate to loyalty or revenue, or why the remaining 10%-15% of customers are itching to sucker-punch agents in the gut.

Here are several of the common practices I’ve seen in call centers that know how to focus on the “customer” and “action” in “customer satisfaction measurement.”


Timely and concise post-contact surveys. Leading call centers use one of three preferred C-Sat survey methods: 1) automated (IVR) phone survey; 2) live phone survey; and/or 3) email survey. Each method enables centers to receive customer feedback immediately or very soon after the customer/agent interaction in question occurs, thus ensuring that the feedback is accurate (assuming the customer didn’t start drinking heavily before/during the call).

All three are viable post-contact survey methods, though each does have its distinct advantage(s). For instance, automated phone surveys can be easily conducted before the caller disconnects, thus increasing survey participation rates and providing particularly timely feedback. While live phone surveys are typically more expensive and time-consuming, the live person conducting the questionnaire can ask customers to elaborate clearly on certain answers and  threaten customers with physical harm when they rate their experience too harshly.

As for how many questions C-Sat surveys should contain, top call centers typically ask no fewer than 4-5 questions, and no more than 7-8 questions. Make your survey too short and you fail to gather sufficient data for spotting key trends and uncovering customer needs/expectations. Make your survey too long and customers will abandon them like your agents did their dream of earning a living wage.

What types of questions should be included? The best post-contact C-Sat surveys ask customers to rate how satisfied they were with their overall service experience, the agent’s knowledge, and the agent’s professionalism/courtesy – as well as whether or not the customer’s issue was resolved. It’s not a bad idea to also include a Net Promoter Score (NPS) type of question, as NPS was first introduced in a Harvard Business Review article and thus must be important.

 
Real-time alerts to help recover highly dissatisfied customers. Smart call centers have designed their survey systems to provide immediate alerts whenever customers compare their service experience unfavorably to undergoing a root canal procedure without Novocain. Such alerts enable companies to attempt a service recovery callback in an effort to regain the customer’s loyalty and credit card number. Naturally, the sooner the recovery team is alerted and responds to an aggravated or infuriated customer, the better are the chances they will be able to “recover” the customer, or at least get him to drop his weapon and come down from the water tower.

Many customers will tell you that the mere act of being contacted personally regarding their recent dissatisfaction is often enough to make them forget how angry your company made them. Of course, sometimes more is required – such as a free offer or upgrade – to repair the damage and sustain a positive relationship with the customer, who may be considering seeing other call centers.

It’s not them. It’s you.  


Use of C-Sat data to provide better, more personalized service and offerings. When handled correctly, the wealth of customer feedback and data captured each day via C-Sat surveys drives continuous improvement and customer loyalty. Careful evaluation of survey results reveals what customers like, dislike and despise about your company, your products, your agents and, most importantly, your on-hold music. Root-cause analysis can help uncover common problems with processes, workflows and performance that can be easily fixed by firing everybody in your IT and Training departments.

In world-class call centers, the actual C-Sat score is far less important to management than is identifying opportunities to keep customers from going to the competition or going insane. That’s not to say that these managers aren’t proud of their high C-Sat average, or that such results don’t occasionally inspire them to do a jig in their office when nobody’s looking or to brag about their impressive rate when drunk at conferences. However, throughout all the jig-dancing and bragging, these managers never lose sight of the fact that C-Sat is not just some stat to be measured, but rather a sentiment to be understood – and acted upon.



Feel free to leave a comment, especially one that makes it look like I know what I'm talking about.


sharon
7/7/2011 10:40:58 pm

Again, thanks for a brightened Friday morning! Greg, you are spot-on, that satisfaction is more than something to measure and track - it requires action!

Both the items on which the recovery team should follow up AND the items that trigger accolades to the service staff who did a great job.

Reply
7/7/2011 10:47:44 pm

Glad you enjoyed the post, Sharon -- thanks for your input!

Yes, more centers need to emphasize the "action" in customer satisfaction measurement/management.

Have a great weekend!

-Greg

Reply
7/8/2011 12:33:39 am

Greg, as usual, right on target. Interesting timing as well. I will pass this post through to a client I am working with right now. They are working to apply speech analytics to their recorded calls to "immediately" recognize those troubled experiences. But we also will be introducing the positive experience of great service. This will initially be shown within the service centers. Good post.

Reply
7/8/2011 12:39:36 am

Thanks for reading the post and passing it along, Andrew.

Great to hear your client is gung-ho about capturing customer sentiment in "real-time". Speech analytics is often over-hyped by providers, but it CAN be a potent tool when applied with care and strategy.

Best,

Greg

Reply
7/8/2011 01:23:52 am

As always a smart and informative post Greg. I completely agree with your section on "Real-time alerts to help recover highly dissatisfied customers". We use post interaction email survey (we are Constant Contact after all). Obviously, post receipt of the completed survey, we analyze the quantitative results, but we also have built exception reporting for exceptional and subpar responses. Exceptional and subpar responses are delivered to our Service Recovery Process Manager. He does two things, 1 short term and 1 long term. In the short term, he will contact the sender (variety of channels - phone, email or social) and thanks them for affirmative comments (sometimes with a little added bonus - free month subscription etc...) or starts a service recovery for individuals who had poor experiences. In the long term, our Service Recovery Process Manager notes a homemade database of the process and cause that failed (along with other key data points). This enables us to understand trends in both process (channels, handoffs, depts) and in cause (poor interaction, incorrect data, response time). Pretty quickly we started to learn that certain processes were seriously impacting overall satisfaction, and have organized teams to correct at a root cause level.

Great stuff again Greg.

Michael Pace
Director of Customer Support & Community Management @Constant Contact

Reply
7/8/2011 01:46:08 am

Excellent, Michael. What you guys are doing epitomizes the art & science of effective C-Sat measurement and follow-up action. Impressive!

You should have your OWN blog, sir. Oh wait, you DO -- and a great one it is.
Check it out, everybody: http://thepaceofservice.com/

Reply
Candy Michael
7/8/2011 04:18:48 am

Excellent article. I am a newbie to your site and will look forward to future post. Right now, I'm forwarding this to our Contact Center Management to make them feel good about how they manage their CSat program.

I do put the fear of God in them...never ask a question that you do not intend to take action on and work both you service recovery alerts and kudos alerts...happy customers liked to be thanked too.

Reply
7/8/2011 08:17:46 am

Thanks very much, Candy -- and welcome!

Great points about C-Sat and kudos, by the way.

Glad to have you on board the Off Center express. Prepare yourself for a fun and wild ride!

Regards,

Greg

Reply



Leave a Reply.